Zenith wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 12:22 am
It's long struck me that the educational (schools) market for electronics and computers did have special requirements, but was something of a stitch-up between pals.
Well actually the thing is that there aren't any special requirements at all. Not one. What happened was people kept selling special requirements to the education authorities and government as a great idea leveraging the early days of computing. Computing is 100% commoditised now and they should just deploy what is required to run the software that is needed which is, much to my disdain, mostly Windows + MS Office. On top of that you can build other tools. Teach programming? Add software. Music? Add software. GIS/Geo? Add software. CAD? Add software. Lectures/conferences? Zoom/Teams etc. Need IO? Buy a box.
Zenith wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 12:22 am
Anyway, what's the obviously better SBC choice?
My point is that is starting at the solution. Define the problem first. An SBC is rarely the correct answer unless you're in an early product development phase or have a very low volume product. And you're quite frankly insane if you're picking the most shonky of products out there. Agilent/Keysight had a reasonable approach when they used embedded CE and were dumping it slowly for Linux; the scopes had a board with the MCU on it.
To point out, education is a very high volume industry which means you need to pick commodity items to drive costs down and ensure that the hardware, software and staff are fungible.
Zenith wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 12:22 am
There's wicked side to you. RMAing those three 1N4007s to CPC to make them jump through the hoops.
That's how you drive process improvements. Turn bad processes into a cost centre.
Zenith wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 12:22 am
It all seems like railing against the Model T Ford for being a crap piece of engineering. It probably was, but a lot of people thought it value for money.
I think that's a bad analogy. The Model T Ford was not entering a commoditised market. The Raspberry Pi is.
The value proposition is terrible versus a second hand desktop PC or a dedicated solution to the problem you are solving with it. Especially where the Raspberry Pi is compared with desktop computers in the education market. Which is my fundamental objection.
Zenith wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 12:22 am
Nonetheless, there's something suspicious about any organisation that has to deflect criticism.
Robert found it. They are a cash grab disguised as a charity.