Interesting findings on the internet
Forum rules
Use tags for the type of equipment your topic is about. Include the "repairs" tag, too, when appropriate. If a new tag is needed, request one in the TEAdministration forum.
Use tags for the type of equipment your topic is about. Include the "repairs" tag, too, when appropriate. If a new tag is needed, request one in the TEAdministration forum.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Decades ago, I commuted into London, arriving at Waterloo, and passing a big sign saying Wang on the way. Being a yoof, I sniggered.
I can confirm from personal experience all the observations made at the other place about Keysight. Mind you, around 2000, I had to get exceedingly stroppy with Tektronix when they refused to repair our five-year-old 2465B oscilloscope and instead offered a discount on a TDS3034. I asked if they wanted me to tell the students that, "Once upon a time, Tek made wonderful test gear, but now they don't even support it properly"? They decided that they could repair the 'scope. I haven't had any grief with them since and they've been much better than HPAK.
I can confirm from personal experience all the observations made at the other place about Keysight. Mind you, around 2000, I had to get exceedingly stroppy with Tektronix when they refused to repair our five-year-old 2465B oscilloscope and instead offered a discount on a TDS3034. I asked if they wanted me to tell the students that, "Once upon a time, Tek made wonderful test gear, but now they don't even support it properly"? They decided that they could repair the 'scope. I haven't had any grief with them since and they've been much better than HPAK.
- Cubdriver
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:23 pm
- Location: Southeastern Litchfield County, CT
- Contact:
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
I have a few Agilent branded instruments, though all but one are early Agilent meaning rebranded HP designed stuff. The only AGILENT Agilent thing is a U1272A DMM bought from their (or Keysight's; it's been too long) eBuy page about ten years ago. I think refusing to support hobbyists/small buyers is a very short sighted business decision as those people sometimes have or eventually get jobs at big companies with large TE budgets. Piss them off and they may ultimately return the favor. I've little doubt that both Bill and Dave are likely spinning in their graves at what's become of their company.Zenith wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2026 12:39 pm I have a fair amount of HP branded TE, but nothing by Agilent or Keysight. I've no experience of their products. A year or so back there was a thread at The Other Place, where people were very pissed off with Keysight. The essence of it was that they were no longer interested in dealing with individual customers, and made it known, and the level of support they gave had dropped enormously.
-Pat
- AVGresponding
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:30 pm
- Location: The Yorkshire
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
That's essentially the reason for my ire. More recently, Rude & Shartz have followed suit.Zenith wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2026 12:39 pmI have a fair amount of HP branded TE, but nothing by Agilent or Keysight. I've no experience of their products. A year or so back there was a thread at The Other Place, where people were very pissed off with Keysight. The essence of it was that they were no longer interested in dealing with individual customers, and made it known, and the level of support they gave had dropped enormously.
nuqDaq yuch Dapol?
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
I notice we are quarter of the way to not being able to read this thread.
Can I suggest we should start an Interesting findings on the internet 2 thread.
Can I suggest we should start an Interesting findings on the internet 2 thread.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Exactly. What's the thing interviewers most want to hear at a job interview? That the applicant does electronics as a hobby. The employees who end up directing technical effort at companies are the ones who do electronics as a hobby.Cubdriver wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 4:54 am I think refusing to support hobbyists/small buyers is a very short sighted business decision as those people sometimes have or eventually get jobs at big companies with large TE budgets. Piss them off and they may ultimately return the favor. I've little doubt that both Bill and Dave are likely spinning in their graves at what's become of their company.
Whether they know it or not, test equipment manufacturers rely on brand allegiance. At work, we had HPAK DMMs, Keithley electrometers, and Tek oscilloscopes. At one point, I mooted the possibility of a R&S oscilloscope, but nobody liked the idea. At another point, an HPAK oscilloscope was mooted, but narrowly voted down. Were I still there, I would probably suggest Keithley DMMs. I had a very good relationship with Tek and in return for providing them with technical feedback, could routinely get 30% (or more) discount on their list prices. Up until then, it was just left to our purchasing people who didn't bother to haggle at all.
I like the sound of Rude & Shortz better.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Bill & Dave's HP was selling high priced, high margin instruments, to companies and the military,to be used by professionals. When you look at the original price and adjust for inflation, the cost is breathtaking. it's hard to imagine private individuals buying new anything they made. Excellent support was part of it. The second hand price was still beyond most amateurs.Cubdriver wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 4:54 amI have a few Agilent branded instruments, though all but one are early Agilent meaning rebranded HP designed stuff. The only AGILENT Agilent thing is a U1272A DMM bought from their (or Keysight's; it's been too long) eBuy page about ten years ago. I think refusing to support hobbyists/small buyers is a very short sighted business decision as those people sometimes have or eventually get jobs at big companies with large TE budgets. Piss them off and they may ultimately return the favor. I've little doubt that both Bill and Dave are likely spinning in their graves at what's become of their company.Zenith wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2026 12:39 pm I have a fair amount of HP branded TE, but nothing by Agilent or Keysight. I've no experience of their products. A year or so back there was a thread at The Other Place, where people were very pissed off with Keysight. The essence of it was that they were no longer interested in dealing with individual customers, and made it known, and the level of support they gave had dropped enormously.
-Pat
The world has changed. Everything is much more commoditised. Looking at Keysight basic AWGs, they cost three times the Siglent or Rigol equivalent, but I'd guess margins are low for Keysight. With names like EDUxxxx I assume they are aimed at universities and so there's a strategic intention. Providing proper support is expensive. I suppose someone has run a spreadsheet over this policy and concluded that it was to Keysight's advantage. As you say, it is short sighted. It leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Adjusting for inflation is notoriously difficult. For a start consider vs prices, wages, then consider vs spare cash.
I like to point out that in the late 70s a Tek 465 cost about my annual salary, and an HP spectrum analyser about the same as a house.
A Motorola 6800 cost a week's wages when I was vacation student - money very well spent
I like to point out that in the late 70s a Tek 465 cost about my annual salary, and an HP spectrum analyser about the same as a house.
A Motorola 6800 cost a week's wages when I was vacation student - money very well spent
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Whichever way you cut it, anything HP, a scope, sig gen, SA etc, cost a lot of money.
This is an interesting find on the internet.
https://www.worldradiohistory.com/index.htm
They have all editions of Wireless World scanned.
https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Wirel ... gazine.htm
In the mid 70s few amateurs had scopes. Amateur electronics was a popular hobby.
In 1975 Scopex were offering a 10MHz dual trace scope for £118 (ex VAT). Affordable, but still quite a lot of money. £6,000 p.a. would have been a reasonable job back then.
A Telequipment D61, also a 10MHz scope, was £138.
I've seen both at swapmeets occasionally. They are very crude.
This is an interesting find on the internet.
https://www.worldradiohistory.com/index.htm
They have all editions of Wireless World scanned.
https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Wirel ... gazine.htm
In the mid 70s few amateurs had scopes. Amateur electronics was a popular hobby.
In 1975 Scopex were offering a 10MHz dual trace scope for £118 (ex VAT). Affordable, but still quite a lot of money. £6,000 p.a. would have been a reasonable job back then.
A Telequipment D61, also a 10MHz scope, was £138.
I've seen both at swapmeets occasionally. They are very crude.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Just so.
My scope comparison was a Tek465 (I.e. good engineer-level scope for TTL, not a 10MHz technician-level scope for TV) in 1978, when my first salary was £3500.
My scope comparison was a Tek465 (I.e. good engineer-level scope for TTL, not a 10MHz technician-level scope for TV) in 1978, when my first salary was £3500.
- nixiefreqq
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 12:41 pm
- Location: commonwealth of pennsylvania
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
a 350 lb former college center lineman and naval gunnery officer once threatened to kick my ass for saying we could "agree to disagree" about a technology preference. if he were still alive big ed would still be saying that we need to stop playing with ethernet switches because ISDN is all we will ever need to implement networks.Zenith wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2026 9:27 pmDepressing but life insurance company life tables end at 110. I have every confidence you have another 30 good years in you.nixiefreqq wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2026 12:15 pm honestly.......I have not rescued any nixie gear in 2 or 3 years. it seems pointless because at 71 some house clean out ape will no doubt soon be tossing the entire lot into a dumpster bound for the recycle center up the road.
See
viewtopic.php?t=483
For a discussion of disposing of the treasured goods of the dearly departed. There's a hazy distinction to be drawn between obvious rubbish and junk. Then there are things (especially portable things) of clear and realiseable value, such as cash, gold coins, bank deposits, deeds, proper antiques and so on. i found it a sordid discussion, but I've been there. Lived experience as they say.
I don't find them cool, and if anything rather a lurking nuisance. Nonetheless, I don't see it as a matter which demands the glove should be thrown down, picked up in acceptance, seconds chosen, weapons chosen and then the matter decided on the field of honour at dawn.nixiefreqq wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2026 12:15 pm maybe realizing this has made me a little grumpy. but saying they are not cool......that's like trash talking my mum.....or claiming new york is better than philly.........or worse yet - declaring that picard is better than kirk.
I'm quite happy to go along with me not having much time for Nixiie tubes and you taking a different view.
oh....I really like "lurking nuisance". do you give me leave to reuse that one?
free range primate since 2011
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
People who have been in the armed services can take you by surprise. I knew someone who left home at 16. He and his step mother hated each other from the off. He joined the merchant navy and after it, got in with a strange, very alternative gal. They started a vegetarian restaurant and they bought a small house on the proceeds. I went there and fixed the wiring, which I thought had been modified by someone who had only the haziest idea of what they were doing, or had been seriously smoking it up. You turned on the light in the living room and nothing happened. Depending on the state of the switch in the kitchen several things could happen. The two way switch for the light for the cupboard under the stairs played an interesting part. Anyway, I fixed it and for Sunday lunch we had nut cutlets. They said they liked them but never offered them in the restaurant, because some people thought that was all vegetarians ate.nixiefreqq wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:38 pm a 350 lb former college center lineman and naval gunnery officer once threatened to kick my ass for saying we could "agree to disagree" about a technology preference. if he were still alive big ed would still be saying that we need to stop playing with ethernet switches because ISDN is all we will ever need to implement networks.
Anyway, a rule of their place was that since they'd paid a lot of money for the carpets, there were no shoes to be worn in the house. I didn't mind.
Since they were married, had a successful business, had a house and were on the way to having a child, he thought a normalisation with his family was appropriate.
His father and stepmother turned up and when asked to remove their shoes, they snorted and buggered off swearing.
His brother, who was a regimental sergeant major, just took his shoes off and went along with things.
Feel free. It's hardly something that can be copyrighted.nixiefreqq wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:38 pm
oh....I really like "lurking nuisance". do you give me leave to reuse that one?
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
It's strange how house rules can cause problems. My mother turned out to have a house rule that she wasn't to be contradicted in her house. She stated this and we promptly left. I thought most people didn't like visitors to wear shoes in their house; I would certainly never object to a request to remove shoes. I'd be a bit surprised if they said they'd spent a lot of money on seating and requested removal of trousers. Once upon a time, visitors expected to be allowed to smoke in a house; these days, they expect to be told to go outside.
The site that has WW also has a bunch of other interesting stuff. Much of which is still in copyright.
The site that has WW also has a bunch of other interesting stuff. Much of which is still in copyright.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
A Chinese goth; you may need to visit a few less traditional pubs.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Three or four months ago, I put up another twenty three feet of book shelves, making about a hundred and twenty feet for my books and journals (probably 75% is technical stuff). The intention was that it should be a lifetime supply of bookshelf. I don't quite understand how it has happened, but the new shelves are full. SWMBO has bookcases dotted around the house, but no technical books, so probably not so many. Book shelves are what you need when you start tripping over books and the window sills are full, so the need for shelves or bookcases follows the number of books, but here's something dismal. Note that the quality or topic of the books is not mentioned; they just want some books. I wonder if they will read any...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
There are many places which sell "books by the yard", e.g. https://curatedbooks.co.uk/books-by-the-metre/
Some places might just want them for pulp value; I suspect that happens to many books given to charity shops (especially Dan Brown!)
And of course others rip them apart and scan them for LLM fodder.
Long ago I heard of a FooF who had stopped buying books, on the principle that his stack of unread books was more than he could read in his remaining lifetime. I have some sympathy for that.
Some places might just want them for pulp value; I suspect that happens to many books given to charity shops (especially Dan Brown!)
And of course others rip them apart and scan them for LLM fodder.
Long ago I heard of a FooF who had stopped buying books, on the principle that his stack of unread books was more than he could read in his remaining lifetime. I have some sympathy for that.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Everyone here has probably found this already but I thought I'd link to it. Cellar full of electronics… https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/237139906659
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
I hadn't.synx508 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2026 11:43 am Everyone here has probably found this already but I thought I'd link to it. Cellar full of electronics… https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/237139906659
Given the lack of light and appalling photos, it is probably a dank cellar and I doubt they will sell much.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Nor me. The defining thing about British cellars is the damp. They're probably hoping not to have to pay someone to take it away. Those are remarkably bad photos.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
It's a long way to Leeds. I'm not impressed that they couldn't be bothered to take halfway decent photos or produce a list, so who knows what's there and what state it's in? From the little I can make out from the pictures, there's nothing on my shopping list. As others have said, a cellar in the UK is likely to be damp and electronics don't like long term exposure to damp, so there's a good chance it's all in a sad state.synx508 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2026 11:43 am Everyone here has probably found this already but I thought I'd link to it. Cellar full of electronics… https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/237139906659
Anyway, the haul of half a dozen items from the SK sale near Southhampton (Croudhill?) finally convinced me that I have enough junk to be going on with.
So, no thanks.
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Well, I'm surprised that you've all passed over the chance to get a Datron 1030A before it was called that! Advance DRM 6 in picture 14-ish!
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp ... er=5181783
Or the more boring Datron 1041M in another picture. I rather liked the Simpson 464 and the display part of an HP spectrum analyser, possibly 8566/8.
But yeah, Leeds isn't appealing…
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp ... er=5181783
Or the more boring Datron 1041M in another picture. I rather liked the Simpson 464 and the display part of an HP spectrum analyser, possibly 8566/8.
But yeah, Leeds isn't appealing…
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
Not Panaplex. Only 3.5 digits. Not interested.synx508 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2026 3:34 pm Well, I'm surprised that you've all passed over the chance to get a Datron 1030A before it was called that! Advance DRM 6 in picture 14-ish!
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp ... er=5181783
Or the more boring Datron 1041M in another picture. I rather liked the Simpson 464 and the display part of an HP spectrum analyser, possibly 8566/8.
But yeah, Leeds isn't appealing…
Picture added viewtopic.php?t=503
Re: Interesting findings on the internet
I think it would be several trips. Wearing a face mask to avoid inhaling mould/spores/droppings.