Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

The place to be when you have TEA. Discuss all kinds of test equipment.

Important: Use tags for the type of equipment your topic is about.
Forum rules
Use tags for the type of equipment your topic is about. Include the "repairs" tag, too, when appropriate. If a new tag is needed, request one in the TEAdministration forum.
User avatar
bd139
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:29 pm
Location: AWOL

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by bd139 »

The Philips blue ones are absolutely fine.

Until they go short!
mansaxel
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 5:52 am

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by mansaxel »

So, new arrival (talked about it in Discord, but that's only half of the introduction to the community.):

-hp- 3478A Multimeter, my first real foray into "many digits". It was not very expensive, but not as cheap as I would have wanted. Contrary to the cautions made by the very decent seller it seems to work quite OK. The calibration has been lost in a battery swap though, so I will have to amass the "reference" sources required for that. 300V DC seems to be the issue for me here; the rest can be dealt with. A -hp- 6209A would come in handy.

Image
(Seller pic)

I have one issue, and that's what looks like a cold joint on the protection zener for one of the 5V supplies. The regulator regulates, and measuring on the legs of the zener gives that the voltage across is consistent with the 4,98V I measure at the test point; indicating that the joint is indeed one, but any failure will of the regulator can have dire consequences, since there are quite many volts regulated to heat in that 7805, and we do not know how a marginal cold joint will react when being in path of the back-up regulator[0]. Getting to the zener will require disassembly.

The seller also warned about the PCB being discoloured by heat in that same area. I did lower the burden on the supply by moving the primary tap to the "240" leg from "220". This clearly noticeably removed heat from the regulation circuitry. We normally hover around 235VAC here, so "240" clearly is the better choice of those.

Image
(Also seller pic)

[0] The elegance of using a zener diode to limit voltage brings to mind the 1940s solution to keeping the lights at 120V aboard US submarines.
tggzzz
Posts: 1549
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:17 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by tggzzz »

One of the joints on that diode is really strange. It looks like some form of ferrule, but doesn't look like it is an "aftermarket bodge". I wonder if it is to allow temporary disconnection by bending the diode out of the way.

Shame about the cal. The 300Vdc into 10Mohm (or lower) isn't trivial, nor is accurate Vac. My trick at lower voltages is to have a DDS function generation, set it to 0.01Hz, capture Vmin and Vmax using a DC voltmeter, and presume those won't change at up to a few kHz.

The only place I have 1kV is in a null voltmeter, driving its internal KVD. I bought an electrophoresis PSU to drive my 100kohm KVD, but it is excessively noisy due to it continually adjusting the voltage and current against my set limits (250W at 1kV? a 10mA current limit isn't a bad thing!)
User avatar
bd139
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:29 pm
Location: AWOL

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by bd139 »

They are ferrules. It's to stop the clamp diode desoldering itself before the fuse pops :lol:
mansaxel
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 5:52 am

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by mansaxel »

bd139 wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:55 am They are ferrules. It's to stop the clamp diode desoldering itself before the fuse pops :lol:
Oh, really?

Cool, if so.

Anyway, needing 300V DC does happen from time to time, so a supply for it is in planning.
Zenith
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Zenith »

mansaxel wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:46 am So, new arrival (talked about it in Discord, but that's only half of the introduction to the community.):

-hp- 3478A Multimeter, my first real foray into "many digits". It was not very expensive, but not as cheap as I would have wanted. Contrary to the cautions made by the very decent seller it seems to work quite OK. The calibration has been lost in a battery swap though, so I will have to amass the "reference" sources required for that. 300V DC seems to be the issue for me here; the rest can be dealt with. A -hp- 6209A would come in handy.
HP 3478As turn up on ebay UK for various prices from about £60 (usually Parts only) to £250 or more, but with no particular assurance they are up to snuff.

I'm starting to get into bench multimeters, but it does occur that it's as well to do your homework on these and profit from the experience of others. Some have EPROMs which have never been copied and some have firmware and hardware which isn't up to scratch and can't be upgraded. Then of course there's the question of calibration, which is either expensive or leads you into volt nuttery.

However, if you can resist the temptation of the quest for 8½ digits, a modest 4½ digit number is a pleasant and useful thing to have. It sits there at the back of the bench, it doesn't use batteries, it doesn't turn itself off in the middle of a lengthy investigation, in most cases the display is easy to read - no peering at dim LCDs, some have GP-IB or other means of data capture and control, which could be useful.
tggzzz
Posts: 1549
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:17 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by tggzzz »

Zenith wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:12 am
mansaxel wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:46 am So, new arrival (talked about it in Discord, but that's only half of the introduction to the community.):

-hp- 3478A Multimeter, my first real foray into "many digits". It was not very expensive, but not as cheap as I would have wanted. Contrary to the cautions made by the very decent seller it seems to work quite OK. The calibration has been lost in a battery swap though, so I will have to amass the "reference" sources required for that. 300V DC seems to be the issue for me here; the rest can be dealt with. A -hp- 6209A would come in handy.
HP 3478As turn up on ebay UK for various prices from about £60 (usually Parts only) to £250 or more, but with no particular assurance they are up to snuff.

I'm starting to get into bench multimeters, but it does occur that it's as well to do your homework on these and profit from the experience of others. Some have EPROMs which have never been copied and some have firmware and hardware which isn't up to scratch and can't be upgraded. Then of course there's the question of calibration, which is either expensive or leads you into volt nuttery.

However, if you can resist the temptation of the quest for 8½ digits, a modest 4½ digit number is a pleasant and useful thing to have. It sits there at the back of the bench, it doesn't use batteries, it doesn't turn itself off in the middle of a lengthy investigation, in most cases the display is easy to read - no peering at dim LCDs, some have GP-IB or other means of data capture and control, which could be useful.
I like meters that can display more than a single value.

Previously I've used RS232/HPIB to dump and post-process streams of readings, but I do like being able to simultaneously see the reading, min/max/mean/stddev.

In that sense my current favourite is my Agilent 34410A (not 01A), with a VFD display. 6.5 digits, which really is more than enough for anything sensible :)

No, I'm not "losing" my 7081 nor 7075 not 2015THD nor 2000, nor 1061 nor ....
mansaxel
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 5:52 am

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by mansaxel »

tggzzz wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:55 am I like meters that can display more than a single value.
I would concur, even if it is from the point of much simpler devices -- my 3 1/2-banger Scopemeter123 does two measurements/traces and also remembers the last unit measured, (with some exceptions, volts after ohms would probably not be sensible, but DCV after ACV most certainly is!) so you will have 4 measurements going, with a fantastically pixly, slow, picture of the waveform or trend. :lol:
Zenith
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Zenith »

Well, you can get carried away with this stuff and on the principle that you can't take it with you when you go, a nice little Siglent SDM3065X Digital Multimeter (or others) might hit this particular ball out of the ground, for all practical purposes.

https://siglent.co.uk/product/siglent-s ... ultimeter/

Nonetheless, buying one for £750 inc VAT, would seem a bit like cheating.
User avatar
bd139
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:29 pm
Location: AWOL

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by bd139 »

I'd take an Agilent for half that and pay to get it calibrated. Or an HM8112-3
Zenith
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Zenith »

I'd probably do the same. Still if you had a serious use for it, and could reclaim the VAT, £750 with a guarantee and a calibration certificate is worth a thought.

What does it cost to get a 6½ digit meter calibrated? I've had a quick look and calibration houses are a bit cagey about publishing their prices, you have to apply for a quote. I'd guess £150.
tggzzz
Posts: 1549
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:17 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by tggzzz »

Zenith wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 9:56 am I'd probably do the same. Still if you had a serious use for it, and could reclaim the VAT, £750 with a guarantee and a calibration certificate is worth a thought.

What does it cost to get a 6½ digit meter calibrated? I've had a quick look and calibration houses are a bit cagey about publishing their prices, you have to apply for a quote. I'd guess £150.
Most calibration houses are set up to give a piece of paper saying your 3.5 digit meter is within spec.

Getting a piece of paper a "your meter said X and our meter said Y+-uncertainty" is something you have to make sure happens :(

Adjustments? What do HPAK/Keithely/Fluke charge :(
Zenith
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Zenith »

This lot do the Full Monty, 3½,4½,5½ and 6½, voltage,current and resistance UKAS accredited, but you have to apply for a quote.

https://www.rhopointmetrology.co.uk/cal ... ultimeter/

They also do capacitance meters and calibrators "traceable".

I'd guess they adjust meters which are software adjustable, but are less keen on opening things up and twiddling presets, all for extra cost. In their position I'd take anybody's money for a certificate such as you describe, assuming the TE in question gave a stable reading. I might refuse to adjust anything over say 20 years old, on the grounds that too much could go wrong.

HP/Agilent/Keysight, R&S, Fluke, Tek will all offer cal services and repair and possibly repair on a best effort basis for items long off the price list. I bet the prices would make your eyes water.
User avatar
Robert
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:08 am

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Robert »

My recntly aquired Wavetek Model 52 not ony had dual display it has two fully isolated input modules and each of those can measure voltage and curreet and thus calculate power at the same time. All for £35. My Keithley 199 is probably favorite though. No dual display but compact with 51/2 big clear red LED digits.
The stack of in-use bench meters is Fluke 8853A (6.5 digit), Keithley 199 (5.5 digit), R&S UDS5 (5.5 digit) and Wavetek 52 (4.5 Digit x 2).
Zenith
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Zenith »

Robert wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 8:39 pm The stack of in-use bench meters is Fluke 8853A (6.5 digit), Keithley 199 (5.5 digit), R&S UDS5 (5.5 digit) and Wavetek 52 (4.5 Digit x 2).
Swanking it and rubbing it in. I like it. I'm only just starting with the bench multimeter scene, but I must admit there's something very alluring about it. A world of wonder.

Do tell us about your calibration standards and how you know these aren't conspiring to produce convincing looking rubbish.
25 CPS
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2022 8:10 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by 25 CPS »

A whole bunch of LED lights on my truck failed in interesting ways fairly close together. Some went dim, some flickered, and I ended up breaking down and buying four to replace the two above the rear license plate and the front marker lights. That's when I discovered the truck's previous owner must've bought dubious e-commerce website aftermarket garbage. Here's an example of one of these lamps that can't be considered a proper automotive product. This more of a proof of concept or a prototype, at best:

Image

Image

Image

It's the same on both sides of the circuit board, two little surface mount diodes, one 24 ohm resistor that both checked out, and one LED. There's a third LED facing out from the end piece that's soldered on. The 34401As got fired up for continuity and diode tests and all of the parts on the lamp I tested checked out and yet this one failed by going dim in service. I know it's not the truck because the replacement worked fine once I installed it so I did a power test on the bench and this is where it got really interesting:

Image

Image

At about 6 volts, the bulb came alive and was blazing at 8 volts then between 8.5 and 9 volts, the whole thing would go dim - and stay that way until the voltage was turned all the way down and then brought back up to the 6 to 8 volt range that it worked at. Going from 9+ volts back down to 8 volts didn't make any change, it had to be turned all the way down or off and then brought back up. Consequently, the bright picture was taken at 8 volts and the dim one at the full automotive 12 volts. This was repeatable too. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to take any measurements across the LEDs to see what was happening between full brightness and going dim, and in hindsight, I should've looped the power feed through another multimeter to be able to observe current consumption as well. I kept the failed lamps so this is definitely a little project for later because I'm curious how exactly these garbage aftermarket LED lamps are failing.

Image

Also on the subject of lighting, I had a beautiful fall afternoon drive to pick up this General Radio Strobotac. It's going to be fun using this to do motion studies, eg. of speaker driver movement etc.
User avatar
Robert
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2022 8:08 am

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Robert »

I've seen this failure mode before. I was working with high current pulse operation of LEDs and seeing how far we could push them. This was on the day job nearly 20 years go. If you ran them too hard the light output whent down along with the forward voltage. If you backed the current off the brightness and Vf incresed but not to the same level. as before the damge. Looking at the LED chip under a microscopr it was clear the some areas wher not producing light. These areas seemd to become some kind of negative resistance with the Vf falling thus shutting down the working part of the chip. Don't know what low level failure mode was but possible migration of doping due to localised heating. Any semiconductor specialists out there care to comment?
Zenith
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by Zenith »

It seems like a plausible explanation. Tunnel LEDs, the component of the future.

These things are operating at the limits.

Here's something I've been curious about. It's the PCB from a 50W work light which failed. It was dead and was thrown out. It produces nothing when 230V is applied so probably not the same failure mode as the auto lights 25CPS has. The unit was cast aluminium and the glass front was glued in place, so it had to be broken to remove the PCB. The PCB is aluminium; it has some sort of insulation with tracks glued to a sheet of aluminium which was in turn glued to the case with some sort of thermal paste/glue. The case has fins on the back.
DSCN2411.JPG
It see some resistors and maybe a couple of over voltage suppressors from the mains to a bridge rectifier. Then some sort of regulator chip working on 230V FW rectified with no reservoir caps, then what is probably an IGFET and then an array of LEDs. The regulator chip and IGFET are made by Reactor Microelectronics, a Chinese company which makes automotive and power control devices. They have a website and there are brief datasheets/specsheets available in Chinese. The devices in this LED unit are not covered on their website. Nothing is obviously burned or damaged.

I had hoped that BigCliveDotCom on YT would have investigated this or something similar, as he looks into a lot of Cheapanese electronics, but no.

It's interesting to look at, but I really can't be bothered to investigate it further and I'll throw it away in due course. What I will say is if you are going to operate one of these units, make damned sure the body is earthed.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
AVGresponding
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:30 pm
Location: The Yorkshire

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by AVGresponding »

If none of the MELF's are melted, I'd suspect an o/c on one of the NTC's (or are they PTC's, some sort of primitive pre-regulator? It's not 100% clear) or a popped transistor. If one of those MLCC's had failed, you'd probably be getting a flash of some sort when you powered it. There's no inductors visible, so it's going to be a linear regulator.
nuqDaq yuch Dapol?

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
User avatar
bd139
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:29 pm
Location: AWOL

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by bd139 »

What's this? You bought another Tek scope. Oh now I'm never going to live this down. I'll create a thread for it :lol:

Naked photo. It does have clothes don't worry.

No fancy ICs abused in this. It is of course broken which I will document elsewhere.

IMG_2325.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
MED6753
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2022 6:02 pm
Location: Middletown, NY USA

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by MED6753 »

bd139 wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 10:16 am What's this? You bought another Tek scope. Oh now I'm never going to live this down. I'll create a thread for it :lol:

Naked photo. It does have clothes don't worry.

No fancy ICs abused in this. It is of course broken which I will document elsewhere.


IMG_2325.jpeg
It's either a 453 or 454.
An old gray beard with an attitude. I don't bite.....sometimes :twisted:
User avatar
bd139
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:29 pm
Location: AWOL

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by bd139 »

MED6753 wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 10:25 am
bd139 wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 10:16 am What's this? You bought another Tek scope. Oh now I'm never going to live this down. I'll create a thread for it :lol:

Naked photo. It does have clothes don't worry.

No fancy ICs abused in this. It is of course broken which I will document elsewhere.


IMG_2325.jpeg
It's either a 453 or 454.
453 viewtopic.php?t=348
User avatar
mnementh
Posts: 1207
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:32 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by mnementh »

25 CPS wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 3:39 am A whole bunch of LED lights on my truck failed in interesting ways fairly close together. Some went dim, some flickered, and I ended up breaking down and buying four to replace the two above the rear license plate and the front marker lights. That's when I discovered the truck's previous owner must've bought dubious e-commerce website aftermarket garbage. Here's an example of one of these lamps that can't be considered a proper automotive product. This more of a proof of concept or a prototype, at best:

Image Image Image

(SNIP)
Sadly, no... as horrible as the engineering is, these are nothing prototype or POC; they are sold by the millions all over fleaBay, Temu, AliEx, etc. Even Bezos' Online Crack Shop has 'em, with the usual Prime delivery markup. Nothing but cheap Chinesium PCB crap, but they're fucking everywhere. Have been for easily a decade now.

They take a "example circuit" from one of the big name product datasheets, usually picked to run close to the envelope of their quality LED emitters in terms of output, and duplicate it in some form-factor that can be made cheaply from custom-cut PCBs and creative soldering.

Which would be technically okay, except then they whittle down the PCB mass to fit as many as possible on a sheet, so it doesn't provide cooling anymore... and they replace all the components with the cheapest Chinesium "alternative parts", and widen the ballast resistor tolerance to like 20% so they can buy whatever is cheapest on the wire today. Then they play the "warranty percentages" game and let their marketplace platform eat the difference.

We westerners created this "race to the bottom" environment; we can't really be surprised when the people we used to squeeze to make it profitable turn around and play the same exact game on us. :roll:

mnem
"Hell is other people." ~Sartre
User avatar
mnementh
Posts: 1207
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:32 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by mnementh »

tggzzz wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:55 am
Zenith wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 10:12 am
mansaxel wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:46 am So, new arrival (talked about it in Discord, but that's only half of the introduction to the community.):

-hp- 3478A Multimeter, my first real foray into "many digits". It was not very expensive, but not as cheap as I would have wanted. Contrary to the cautions made by the very decent seller it seems to work quite OK. The calibration has been lost in a battery swap though, so I will have to amass the "reference" sources required for that. 300V DC seems to be the issue for me here; the rest can be dealt with. A -hp- 6209A would come in handy.
HP 3478As turn up on ebay UK for various prices from about £60 (usually Parts only) to £250 or more, but with no particular assurance they are up to snuff.

I'm starting to get into bench multimeters, but it does occur that it's as well to do your homework on these and profit from the experience of others. Some have EPROMs which have never been copied and some have firmware and hardware which isn't up to scratch and can't be upgraded. Then of course there's the question of calibration, which is either expensive or leads you into volt nuttery.

However, if you can resist the temptation of the quest for 8½ digits, a modest 4½ digit number is a pleasant and useful thing to have. It sits there at the back of the bench, it doesn't use batteries, it doesn't turn itself off in the middle of a lengthy investigation, in most cases the display is easy to read - no peering at dim LCDs, some have GP-IB or other means of data capture and control, which could be useful.
I like meters that can display more than a single value.

Previously I've used RS232/HPIB to dump and post-process streams of readings, but I do like being able to simultaneously see the reading, min/max/mean/stddev.

In that sense my current favourite is my Agilent 34410A (not 01A), with a VFD display. 6.5 digits, which really is more than enough for anything sensible :)

No, I'm not "losing" my 7081 nor 7075 not 2015THD nor 2000, nor 1061 nor ....
Which was precisely what I arrived at when I went shopping for a replacement for my venerable Fluke 87 Rev0.1 that was stolen during a move... after much consideration I decided that for my "go-to" diag meter I wanted A) at least another digit and 2) dual display to speed up troubleshooting so I could tell at a glance whether the DC rail that looked good in terms of DC voltage actually had large AC riding on it, etc...

After much comparing I came up with the 87/IV aka 189. And I bought one. And immediately after, I got my 3478A. And then my 25, and my 8860A... and...

mnem
Image
25 CPS
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2022 8:10 pm

Re: Test Equipment Anonymous (TEA) : Discussion and Group Therapy Thread

Post by 25 CPS »

mnementh wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 12:38 pm Sadly, no... as horrible as the engineering is, these are nothing prototype or POC; they are sold by the millions all over fleaBay, Temu, AliEx, etc. Even Bezos' Online Crack Shop has 'em, with the usual Prime delivery markup. Nothing but cheap Chinesium PCB crap, but they're fucking everywhere. Have been for easily a decade now.

They take a "example circuit" from one of the big name product datasheets, usually picked to run close to the envelope of their quality LED emitters in terms of output, and duplicate it in some form-factor that can be made cheaply from custom-cut PCBs and creative soldering.

Which would be technically okay, except then they whittle down the PCB mass to fit as many as possible on a sheet, so it doesn't provide cooling anymore... and they replace all the components with the cheapest Chinesium "alternative parts", and widen the ballast resistor tolerance to like 20% so they can buy whatever is cheapest on the wire today. Then they play the "warranty percentages" game and let their marketplace platform eat the difference.

We westerners created this "race to the bottom" environment; we can't really be surprised when the people we used to squeeze to make it profitable turn around and play the same exact game on us. :roll:

mnem
"Hell is other people." ~Sartre
I ended up replacing the headlights as well, so all but one of the LED conversion lamps that were in the truck when I bought it at the end of 2021 have been replaced. The pictures I attached are of one of the rear license plate lamps; the sole remaining lamp is the other one from the rear plate holder. It'll be interesting to see how long it lasts for since it's already outlived the rest of the kit.

Thankfully replacing the headlight bulbs were a straightforward, no tools required replacement since I ended up doing those on Monday while I was out of town on a trip. This would not have been nearly as easily done on my previous vehicle where the manual says the front bumper cover needs to be removed to access the headlight clusters to replace bulbs. It was possible to replace headlights from behind but it involved some really, really painful contortions which I did it a few times but always walked away with some cuts and scrapes. Given how safety critical they are, I really think headlights and turn signals should be designed so that the bulbs are easily field-replaceable, ideally without any tools, but that's just my opinion and clearly not one shared by all of the automakers.
Post Reply