bd139 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:02 am
tggzzz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:36 pm
I wouldn't want to drive anywhere
interesting in Iceland: too dangerous. Well, it was in '84 and '90, but they appear to have sanitised the place somewhat since then - safety barriers by large drops FFS.
Dangerous: being in a large 4WD coach, fording a river to get to the Þórsmörk campsite, and being pushed sideways by the water that came up onto the side of the coach body. Then there's the tyre-shredding glassy roads in the Sprengisandur that see vehicles
very occasionally; the farms are
150km apart so you are on your own. Here's the single road junction on that main "F26" route:
https://www.google.com/maps/@65.0154707 ... &entry=ttu
I really ought to post a couple of pictures.
It's probably nicer now but every few miles there's a wrecked rental 4x4 held together with tape and what I assume is an Icelandic sticker on it saying "police already aware of this one".
Well, yes, but... I didn't see many cars, let alone wrecked cars. Not so many people went 35/40 years ago. It hadn't been featured on Top Gear and the like. Reykjavik wasn't yet a have-a-party destination, Hells teeth, the first time I went beer was
illegal, but spirits were legal (go figure!). Beer became legal in, IIRC 1989.
I did, however do the calculations of taking a 4x4 from here on the Immingham <-> Faeroes <-> Seyðisfjörður ferry vs hiring a 4x4 there for a couple of weeks. Both were unaffordable.
You can get plenty of interesting places on foot in under an hour from a non F-road. A good day hike was the one attached below which was a 10km walk to the foot of a glacier which is actually not sexy and blue but post-nuclear armageddon.
And more if you venture further. E.g. walking
under a glacier, with your feet in warm water. Or seeing realistic remains of trolls that got caught out.
The risk of course was falling rocks and slipping and breaking something. Travel in pairs, just not with a German psychotherapist who would tell you a broken ankle is all in your mind.
Pairs of people in case of accident is obvious to everybody. Pairs of cars is obvious to anybody that has been to such places - to help you pulling out of rivers.
Psychotherapists only have hammers, so everything looks like ... etc.
Main driving risks are fuckwits who drive F350 trucks in the middle of the road and companions who don't drive often and can't quite work out the gears. My poor anus was destroyed by that level of puckering.
Ah. My experiences were different.
First of all you had to
spot many roads before you could follow them. Often they were merely a couple of wheel track depressions with some moss growing in them. That implies there's no edge, so even the
concept of the middle of the road is moot.
Secondly, even on the main ring-road, the concept of sides was moot since it was single track.
OK, a couple of piccies....
First Gullfoss. Note the scale of the people and absence of guardrails; back then they took the attitude that if you couldn't figure out that wet rocks + drop = danger, then the species was about to be improved. The lower picture was taken from the ledge towards the red dot. Doubt you could do that now.
i-gullfoss.jpg
Second Sprengisandur. The top is the same major junction as in the gurgle photo, but note you don't need a high wheelbase vehicle to climb out of the
road channel. Nowadays it looks like you don't need self-steering cars: just put them in the channel and they will stay in the channel! The bottom shows moss in track, and the difficulty of spotting where the road is (and bugger the road edge!)
i-sprengisandur.jpg
Apologies for the lack of contrast in the latter photo - it has faded over 40 years (but less than some which are 30 years old!). Maybe the negatives would have fared better; if not then it is a Roy Batty moment