Tektronix 468

The place to be when you have TEA. Discuss all kinds of test equipment.

Important: Use tags for the type of equipment your topic is about.
Forum rules
Use tags for the type of equipment your topic is about. Include the "repairs" tag, too, when appropriate. If a new tag is needed, request one in the TEAdministration forum.
Post Reply
synx508
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2023 6:13 am
Location: UK

Tektronix 468

Post by synx508 »

This Tektronix 468 with both service manual volumes and the operator's manual was unavoidable, at the rally. I was told that it had a bad timebase but what I wasn't told was that the person who reassembled it after deciding they couldn't fix the timebase had mangled one of the internal coaxial connectors rendering the horizontal output inoperative.
Once I'd bashed the connector back into shape the deflection was restored and on to the next problem, there was no triggering and no timebase activity at all. X-Y mode worked, so all was not lost. Power supply voltages seemed almost perfect.
I swapped the Tek ICs between the A and B timebases and this restored the A timebase and triggering, as expected the B timebase is inoperative.
The digital storage feature seems to work but there's a problem with the cursor knob, turning either way decreases the value, so the cursors roll off the bottom (V) or left (t) of the screen. Not very convenient. I'll stare at the schematic tomorrow to see if there could be an electronic reason for this but perhaps the switch is broken in some very strange way.
There are a few other problems, attenuators on channel 1 (again!), width of the trace seems inadequate and in non-storage mode at lower sweep rates the blanking is completely messed up, blanking beginning about a third of the way across the screen - again, not terribly convenient.
It looks stunning though, if you twist your head around a bit…
Image

Tags:
tggzzz
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:17 pm

Re: Tektronix 468

Post by tggzzz »

Overall I quite liked my 468, but not enough to prevent me flogging it.

The analogue part is a 465B, which is a good start.

The digitising part is slow but not based on a CCD sampler, thus avoiding slow sweep speed aliasing problems. Indeed, it even has an "envelope detect" mode that wouldn't reappear for several decades.
Zenith
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Tektronix 468

Post by Zenith »

On balance I'm glad I didn't spot that one. I did come away with a Tek 465 which is still in the car. I've been investigating a Wavetek function generator which came from there.

I always feel a sense of relief when those Peltola connectors fit back successfully. They look very easy to damage. I haven't wrecked one yet.
tggzzz
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:17 pm

Re: Tektronix 468

Post by tggzzz »

Zenith wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:03 am On balance I'm glad I didn't spot that one. I did come away with a Tek 465 which is still in the car. I've been investigating a Wavetek function generator which came from there.

I always feel a sense of relief when those Peltola connectors fit back successfully. They look very easy to damage. I haven't wrecked one yet.
I haven't had a problem with the Petolta connectors, mainly because they are open frame so you can see whether the solid core is entering the inner socket correctly. If that wasn't the case then it would be easy to push a bit too hard and terminally (ho ho) bend the solid core.
Zenith
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:06 pm

Re: Tektronix 468

Post by Zenith »

tggzzz wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:55 am I haven't had a problem with the Petolta connectors, mainly because they are open frame so you can see whether the solid core is entering the inner socket correctly. If that wasn't the case then it would be easy to push a bit too hard and terminally (ho ho) bend the solid core.
Peltola, definitely Peltola.

https://w140.com/tekwiki/wiki/Peltola_connector

I have peculiar difficulty remembering the name and have to look it up. I always want to call them Pelota connectors.
tggzzz
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2022 8:17 pm

Re: Tektronix 468

Post by tggzzz »

Zenith wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:42 am
tggzzz wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:55 am I haven't had a problem with the Petolta connectors, mainly because they are open frame so you can see whether the solid core is entering the inner socket correctly. If that wasn't the case then it would be easy to push a bit too hard and terminally (ho ho) bend the solid core.
Peltola, definitely Peltola.

https://w140.com/tekwiki/wiki/Peltola_connector

I have peculiar difficulty remembering the name and have to look it up. I always want to call them Pelota connectors.
I always call them Petolta; people seem to understand me ;)
Post Reply