tggzzz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2026 6:26 pm
David Munrow, Music of the Gothic Era.
Emma Kirkby, A Feather on the Breath of God.
Both on yootoob, if you must.
With YouTube you can explore it without shelling out. Both of these I will investigate.
I think a difference came when music changed from being a thing you paid for; sheet music, a 78, 45 or 33rpm record, to something essentially free; cassettes, and CD and DVD recorders, which the recording industry fought a losing battle against. I never had much sympathy for the recording industry. At one time they were lobbying for a general tax on cassettes, from which they would receive a payout to compensate for supposed lost revenue.
Then there's difference between music which is performed in the background to dancing or whatever, and the performance being part of an act.
tggzzz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 10, 2026 6:26 pm
I wonder if their interpretation of early music manuscripts is correct. We'll never know, but it is pleasing.
Plainsong, not the later choral traditions.
Bach (and earlier) music is pure. Later music is impure twaddle.
Pronunciation of language centuries ago is sort of agreed on from rhymes in poetry and other means. This is something I like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHspDQZKvwg
No way would that have been conceived and performed in the 13th century. There were very definite and nearly mutually unintelligible dialects of English until the 20th century.
I'm not sure you can draw so clear a line between pure music and impure twaddle. Blues, Jazz, Ragtime, Kweala?
Vivaldi was a contemporary of Bach. They met and Bach transcribed some of Vivaldi's works. He spent much of his time teaching in an orphanage for girls in Venice. Vivaldi's orchestra of little girls were considered to upstage the best professional musicians. I've come across one account of his playing. An evening at which a large number of bottles of wine were consumed and maestro Vivaldi played impossibly difficult pieces and was thought to be showing off. I always thought he found it too easy.